Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Rinaldo Bellomo"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Reviews
Basic science and research
The Role of Oliguria and the Absence of Fluid Administration and Balance Information in Illness Severity Scores
Neil J. Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(2):106-123.   Published online May 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2017.00192
  • 13,432 View
  • 324 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Urinary examination has formed part of patient assessment since the earliest days of medicine. Current definitions of oliguria are essentially arbitrary, but duration and intensity of oliguria have been associated with an increased risk of mortality, and this risk is not completely attributable to the development of concomitant acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by changes in serum creatinine concentration. The increased risk of death associated with the development of AKI itself may be modified by directly or indirectly by progressive fluid accumulation, due to reduced elimination and increased fluid administration. None of the currently extant major illness severity scoring systems or outcome prediction models use modern definitions of AKI or oliguria, or any values representative of fluid volumes variables. Even if a direct relationship with mortality is not observed, then it is possible that fluid balance or fluid volume variables mediate the relationship between illness severity and mortality in the renal and respiratory physiological domains. Fluid administration and fluid balance may then be an important, easily modifiable therapeutic target for future investigation. These relationships require exploration in large datasets before being prospectively validated in groups of critically ill patients from differing jurisdictions to improve prognostication and mortality prediction.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of oliguria
    Marlies Ostermann, Andrew D. Shaw, Michael Joannidis
    Intensive Care Medicine.2023; 49(1): 103.     CrossRef
  • Nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury – 2020 consensus of the Taiwan AKI-task force
    Shao-Yu Yang, Terry Ting-Yu Chiou, Chih-Chung Shiao, Hugo You-Hsien Lin, Ming-Jen Chan, Che-Hsiung Wu, Chiao-Yin Sun, Wei-Jie Wang, Yen-Ta Huang, Vin-Cent Wu, Yung-Chang Chen, Ji-Tsung Fang, Shang-Jyh Hwang, Heng-Chih Pan
    Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.2022; 121(4): 749.     CrossRef
  • Haemodynamic frailty – A risk factor for acute kidney injury in the elderly
    Neil G. Docherty, Christian Delles, Patrick D’Haese, Anita T. Layton, Carlos Martínez-Salgado, Benjamin A. Vervaet, Francisco J. López-Hernández
    Ageing Research Reviews.2021; 70: 101408.     CrossRef
  • Does Fluid Type and Amount Affect Kidney Function in Critical Illness?
    Neil J. Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo
    Critical Care Clinics.2018; 34(2): 279.     CrossRef
Cardiology/Surgery/Basic science and research
The Complexities of Intravenous Fluid Research: Questions of Scale, Volume, and Accumulation
Neil J Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2016;31(4):276-299.   Published online November 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2016.00934
  • 19,192 View
  • 568 Download
  • 14 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Despite near ubiquity, information regarding fluids consumption at a health care systems level, and patient exposure at an individual level, is surprisingly limited in the medical literature. The epidemiology of the foundational medical intervention of intravenous fluid administration is incredibly complex, with millions of patients being exposed internationally every year. Fluid is being given for different reasons, to different targets, following different triggers, by different specialties in different countries, and any observations that can be made are thought to have limited external validity to other jurisdictions and patient groups. The independent effects of fluid administration and fluid accumulation are very hard to separate from other markers of illness severity and aspects of the process of care. Fluid accumulation can result in organ injury, even when the fluid is being given to purportedly ameliorate or prevent such injury, and if it were independently associated with mortality then would be an easily accessible and modifiable risk factor for subsequent morbidity or death. Despite their ubiquity, it is clear that we have limited understanding of the effects of the intravenous fluids we use daily in the most vulnerable of patient groups. The research agenda in this field is large and urgent.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Closed-Loop Control of Fluid Resuscitation Using Reinforcement Learning
    Elham Estiri, Hossein Mirinejad
    IEEE Access.2023; 11: 140569.     CrossRef
  • Fluid Stewardship of Maintenance Intravenous Fluids
    John R. Carr, W. Anthony Hawkins, Andrea Sikora Newsome, Susan E. Smith, Clemmons Amber B, Christopher M. Bland, Trisha N. Branan
    Journal of Pharmacy Practice.2022; 35(5): 769.     CrossRef
  • Clinician attitudes and concordance with self-assessed and actual intravenous fluid prescribing patterns: A single-institution evaluation of survey and electronic prescribing data
    Michelle C. Spiegel, Annie N. Simpson, Nandita R. Nadig, Dee W. Ford, Andrew J. Goodwin
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2022; 364(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Acetate‐ versus lactate‐buffered crystalloid solutions: A systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Karen Louise Ellekjaer, Anders Perner, Praleene Sivapalan, Morten Hylander Møller
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.2022; 66(7): 782.     CrossRef
  • A fuzzy model for predicting burn patients’ intravenous fluid resuscitation rate
    Sayma Alam Suha, M. Akhtaruzzaman, Tahsina Farah Sanam
    Healthcare Analytics.2022; 2: 100070.     CrossRef
  • Development and implementation of a clinical decision support-based initiative to drive intravenous fluid prescribing
    Michelle C. Spiegel, Annie N. Simpson, Achsah Philip, Carolyn M. Bell, Nandita R. Nadig, Dee W. Ford, Andrew J. Goodwin
    International Journal of Medical Informatics.2021; 156: 104619.     CrossRef
  • Influence of acetate containing fluid versus lactate containing fluid on acid-base status, electrolyte level, and blood lactate level in dehydrated dogs
    Annika Heitland, Ute Klein-Richers, Katrin Hartmann, René Dörfelt
    Veterinary World.2021; : 2714.     CrossRef
  • Infusion fluids: a clinical pharmacologist’s view
    E.A. Ushkalova, S.K. Zyryanov, K.E. Zatolochina, O.I. Butranova
    Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya.2021; (6): 100.     CrossRef
  • Pathophysiology of Volume Administration in Septic Shock and the Role of the Clinical Pharmacist
    Brittany D. Bissell, Breanne Mefford
    Annals of Pharmacotherapy.2020; 54(4): 388.     CrossRef
  • Lactate versus acetate buffered intravenous crystalloid solutions: a scoping review
    Karen L. Ellekjaer, Anders Perner, Martine M. Jensen, Morten H. Møller
    British Journal of Anaesthesia.2020; 125(5): 693.     CrossRef
  • Balanced Crystalloid Solutions
    Matthew W. Semler, John A. Kellum
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.2019; 199(8): 952.     CrossRef
  • Does Fluid Type and Amount Affect Kidney Function in Critical Illness?
    Neil J. Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo
    Critical Care Clinics.2018; 34(2): 279.     CrossRef
  • Resuscitation fluids
    Jonathan D. Casey, Ryan M. Brown, Matthew W. Semler
    Current Opinion in Critical Care.2018; 24(6): 512.     CrossRef
  • Utility of Volume Assessment Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study
    Ki Hyun Park, Jung-ho Shin, Jin Ho Hwang, Su Hyun Kim
    The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2017; 32(3): 256.     CrossRef

ACC : Acute and Critical Care